Skip Navigation



Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access published online on June 17, 2008
Cambridge Journal of Economics, doi:10.1093/cje/ben023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/1/1    most recent
ben023v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Runde, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nikolychuk, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

On technological objects and the adoption of technological product innovations: rules, routines and the transition from analogue photography to digital imaging

Jochen Runde, Matthew Jones, Kamal Munir and Lynne Nikolychuk*

* Judge Business School, University of Cambridge and Kings College, London, University of London

Address for correspondence: Jochen Runde, Judge Business School, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK; email: j.runde{at}jbs.cam.ac.uk

We extend the transformational model of social activity proposed in recent realist social theory by importing into it a theory of technological objects and technological change. The paper begins with an account of the transformational model, focusing particularly on the relationship between routines and social rules. We then outline a theory of what we call the ‘technical identity’ of technological objects, drawing on the notion of collective assignments of agentive functions proposed by the philosopher John Searle. Finally, we link this theory to the transformational model and derive three broad categories of technological change. The framework as a whole is illustrated with empirical material drawn from a recent study of the shift from analogue photography to digital imaging in consumer photography.

Key Words:

JEL classification:

Manuscript received November 16, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.