Skip Navigation



Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access published online on December 6, 2007
Cambridge Journal of Economics, doi:10.1093/cje/bem051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/3/367    most recent
bem051v3
bem051v2
bem051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erixon, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

The Swedish third way: an assessment of the performance and validity of the Rehn–Meidner model

Lennart Erixon*

* Stockholm University

Address for correspondence: Department of Economics, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; email: lex{at}ne.su.se

This paper analyses the functioning of the Rehn–Meidner model in Sweden and the validity of the model's underlying theory. Both sceptics and friends of ‘the Swedish model’ have exaggerated the effects of active labour market policy and solidarity wage policy on employment, inflation and growth. However, these policies have contributed to the reduction of hysteresis effects and wage differentials in Sweden. Furthermore, Swedish experiences confirm the Rehn–Meidner view that positive demand shocks and expansionary macroeconomic policies make it difficult to combine full employment with price stability, economic growth and equity even if central wage negotiations are coordinated and trade unions willingly accept wage restraint.

Key Words: Rehn–Meidner model • Wage policy of solidarity • Labour market policy • Phillips curve • Productivity growth

JEL classifications: E31, E63, J31, O11

Manuscript received November 17, 2006; final version received October 20, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.