Skip Navigation



Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access published online on July 20, 2006
Cambridge Journal of Economics, doi:10.1093/cje/bel021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/2/309    most recent
bel021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.
Received August 1, 2005
Revised April 26, 2006

Article

The Research Assessment Exercise, the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities

Frederic S. Lee 1 *

1 University of Missouri-Kansas City

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Frederic S. Lee, E-mail: leefs{at}umkc.edu


  Abstract

In previous research on the impact of the Research Assessment Exercise on heterodox economics and heterodox economists in the UK, the author concluded that reliance on Diamond List journals to rank departments would drive economic departments to discriminate positively in terms of their hiring, promotion and research strategies in favour of mainstream economists and their research, in order to maintain or improve their ranking. As a consequence, the author predicted there would be no or only a token presence of heterodox economists in an increasing number of departments. Whether the conclusions still hold and the predictions materialise is the subject of the paper.

Keywords: Research assessment exercise; Heterodox economics.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.