Skip Navigation



Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access published online on March 22, 2006
Cambridge Journal of Economics, doi:10.1093/cje/bej002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/6/901    most recent
bej002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMaster, R.
Right arrow Articles by Watkins, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.
Received May 19, 2003
Revised August 12, 2005

Article

Economics and underdetermination: a case study of urban land and housing economics

Robert McMaster 1 * and Craig Watkins 2

1 University of Aberdeen
2 University of Sheffield

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Robert McMaster, E-mail: r.mcmaster{at}abdn.ac.uk


  Abstract

Underdetermination, associated with the Duhem-Quine thesis, is a familiar if under-researched theme in economics. In the light of this, we examine the development of urban land and housing economics. Through its Cartesian dualistic delineation of theory and data, the contemporary mainstream approach appears unable to circumvent the problem of underdetermination. In effect, it employs the strong version of Duhem-Quine in its retention of the assumption of a single, unitary competitive market (and associated access-space trade-off). Conversely, we highlight the affinity of Ely's (and the later Columbia School's) approach to pragmatists Dewey and Peirce, which provides a more fruitful basis for explanation.

Keywords: Richard T. Ely; Duhem-Quine Thesis; Underdetermination; New Urban Economics; Theory-data dual.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.