Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on October 24, 2007
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2007 31(6):1007-1023; doi:10.1093/cje/bem029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/6/1007    most recent
bem029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fothergill, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
Right arrow I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

A million off Incapacity Benefit: how achievable is Labour's target?

Steve Fothergill and Ian Wilson*

* Sheffield Hallam University

Address for correspondence: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK

Since 1997, welfare reform has been a defining feature of the UK's Labour government. This article assesses the extent to which the new aspiration to reduce the number of incapacity benefit claimants by one million within 10 years is deliverable. The assessment is based on a model of flows on and off incapacity benefits and their impact on the stock of claimants. In particular, the analysis takes account of the major geographical variations in the distribution of incapacity claimants and the ability of Britain's divergent regional economies to absorb substantial numbers of extra workers. The article concludes that without an accelerated revival in the economies of the North, Scotland and Wales, Labour looks set to fall short of the one million target.

Key Words: Incapacity Benefit • Regions • Pathways to Work • Joblessness

JEL classifications:

Manuscript received January 29, 2007; final version received July 28, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
C. Grover
Privatizing employment services in Britain
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2009; 29(3): 487 - 509.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
M. Kitson and F. Wilkinson
The economics of New Labour: policy and performance
Camb. J. Econ., November 1, 2007; 31(6): 805 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.