Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on January 20, 2007
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2007 31(3):423-443; doi:10.1093/cje/bel037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/3/423    most recent
bel037v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jayadev, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow E10 - General
Right arrow E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
Right arrow F30 - General
Right arrow F32 - Current Account Adjustment; Short-Term Capital Movements
Right arrow J53 - Labor-Management Relations; Industrial Jurisprudence
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Capital account openness and the labour share of income

Arjun Jayadev*

* University of Massachusetts

Address for correspondence: Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston MA, USA; email: arjun.jayadev{at}umb.edu.

This paper investigates the relationship between capital account openness and the share of labour in national income. Employing a new index of financial openness and a cross-country panel of labour shares available from the United Nations System of National Accounts, the author shows a robust negative correlation between the degree of openness and the labour share. Although this effect is not present for low income countries, the direct negative relationship holds for all other subsamples and in the presence of a variety of controls. A plausible explanation is that openness alters the conditions of bargaining between labour and capital. By increasing the bargaining strength of capital vis-a-vis labour, increased capital mobility raises rents accruing to capital. Thus, capital account openness may reduce labour's share of income in the firm, and thereby, at an economy-wide level, its share of national output.

Key Words: Capital Mobility • Factor Shares • Bargaining • Openness • Labour Share

JEL Classification: E1, E25, F3, J53

Manuscript received April 18, 2005; final version received January 30, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
P. Arestis and A. Caner
Capital account liberalisation and poverty: how close is the link?
Camb. J. Econ., November 10, 2009; (2009) bep062v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cambridge J Regions Econ SocHome page
P. Arestis and A. Caner
Financial liberalization and the geography of poverty
Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, July 1, 2009; 2(2): 229 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.