Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on August 8, 2005
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2006 30(2):293-306; doi:10.1093/cje/bei060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/2/293    most recent
bei060v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B40 - General
Right arrow E40 - General
Right arrow E42 - Monetary Systems; Standards; Regimes; Government and the Monetary System
Right arrow E50 - General
Right arrow E52 - Monetary Policy (Targets, Instruments, and Effects)
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Article

Doing without money: a critical assessment of Woodford's analysis

C. Rogers*

* School of Economics, University of Adelaide

Address for correspondence: School of Economics, University of Adelaide North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia 5005; email: colin.rogers{at}adelaide.edu.au

Abstract

Woodford employs an inter-temporal general equilibrium model to examine the properties of the monetary system as it evolves from the use of a physical medium of exchange to an electronic medium. He presents a structure in which cash as a means of payment can be made to vanish at the limit, but where he claims the price level remains determinate. It is shown that Woodford's analysis involves fundamental but still widespread conceptual and methodological errors. His general equilibrium model does not map into the world of electronic money, and his analysis has no implications for the art of central banking.

Key Words: Electronic money • Cashless limit • Hahn property • Accounting systems of exchange

JEL classifications: B40, E40, E42, E50

Manuscript received July 26, 2003; final version received November 9, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.