Skip Navigation

Cambridge Journal of Economics 2005 29(1):19-36; doi:10.1093/cje/bei001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Love, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Roper, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
Right arrow L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure
Right arrow L24 - Contracting Out; Joint Ventures; Technology Licensing
Right arrow O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 29, No. 1, © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2005; all rights reserved

Economists' perceptions versus managers' decisions: an experiment in transaction-cost analysis

James H. Love and Stephen Roper*

* Aston Business School, Aston University, UK

Address for correspondence: James. H. Love, Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK; email: j.h.love{at}aston.ac.uk

Are the perceptions of professional economists on transaction costs consistent with make-or-buy decisions made within firms? The answer may have important implications for transaction cost research. Data on firms' outsourcing during the new product development process are taken from a large-scale survey of UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants, and we test the consistency of these outsourcing decisions with the predictions derived from the transaction cost perceptions of a panel of economists. Little consistency is evident between actual outsourcing patterns and the predictions of the (Williamsonian) transactions cost model derived from the panel of economists. There is, however, evidence of a systematic pattern to the differences, suggesting that a competence or resource-based approach may be relevant to understanding firm outsourcing, and that firms are adopting a strategic approach to managing their external relationships.

Key Words: Transaction costs • Outsourcing • Economists' perceptions • Experiment

JEL classifications: D23, L22, O31

Manuscript received July 2, 2002; final version received June 30, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.