Skip Navigation

Cambridge Journal of Economics 2004 28(5):767-790; doi:10.1093/cje/beh034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowthorn, R.
Right arrow Articles by Coutts, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow E24 - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution
Right arrow F10 - General
Right arrow F32 - Current Account Adjustment; Short-Term Capital Movements
Right arrow L16 - Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics; Macroeconomic Industrial Structure; Industrial Price Indices
Right arrow L60 - General
Right arrow O14 - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
Right arrow O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, No. 5, © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2004; all rights reserved

Commentary

This section is designed for the discussion and debate of current economic problems. Contributions which raise new issues or comment on issues already raised are welcome.

De-industrialisation and the balance of payments in advanced economies

Robert Rowthorn and Ken Coutts*

Address for correspondence: Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DD; email: rer3{at}econ.cam.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper defines de-industrialisation as a secular decline in the share of manufacturing in national employment. De-industrialisation, in this sense, has been a widespread feature of economic growth in advanced economies in recent decades. The paper considers briefly what explains this development and quantifies some of the factors responsible. It then examines the experience of Britain and America, which are two countries that have combined rapid de-industrialisation with a strong overall economic performance. The paper considers both the domestic situation of manufacturing industry in these countries and its foreign trade performance. It concludes by examining in detail the British balance of payments, and documenting how improvements in the non-manufacturing sphere have helped offset a worsening performance in manufacturing trade.

Key Words: De-industrialisation • Balance of payments • OECD economies

JEL classifications: F1, O14, O57

Manuscript received February 16, 2004; final version received April 28, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
K. Coutts, A. Glyn, and B. Rowthorn
Structural change under New Labour
Camb. J. Econ., November 1, 2007; 31(6): 845 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.