Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B51 - Socialist; Marxian; Sraffian
Right arrow D30 - General
Right arrow D50 - General
Right arrow E12 - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian
Right arrow E13 - Neoclassical
Right arrow E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
Right arrow O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics 28:527-547 (2004)
Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, No. 4, © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2004; all rights reserved

Capital, distribution and macroeconomics: ‘core’ beliefs and theoretical foundations

Graham White*

Address for correspondence: School of Economics and Political Science, University of Sydney Sydney, Australia; email: graham{at}econ.usyd.edu.au

The paper suggests an alternative ‘benchmark’ model or ‘microfoundations’ for theorising about macroeconomic phenomena in the case of competitive equilibria. This alternative reflects a classical-Sraffian explanation of relative prices. This approach also provides a coherent framework for the analysis of the choice of technique in a multi-commodity setting. In turn, it leads to results which throw into question a number of key propositions of conventional macro theory, including the notion of a long-run self-correcting mechanism for involuntary unemployment in the presence of wage and price flexibility. The paper argues that a classical-Sraffian approach provides a means of reconciling Keynesian results with competitive outcomes.

Key Words: Sraffian • Keynesian • Competitive • Benchmark • Capital

JEL classifications: B51, D3, D5, E120, E130

Manuscript received October 29, 2002; final version received January 6, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.