Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michl, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Foley, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow E60 - General
Right arrow E10 - General
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics 28:1-20 (2004)
Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, No. 1, © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2004; all rights reserved

Social security in a Classical growth model

Thomas R. Michl and Duncan K. Foley*

Address for correspondence: Duncan Foley, Department of Economics, Graduate Faculty, New School University, 65 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10003, USA; email: foleyd{at}newschool.edu

JEL classifications: El, E6

This paper develops a growth model with overlapping generations of workers who save for life-cycle reasons and Ricardian capitalists who save from a bequest motive. The population of workers accommodates growth, so that the rate of capital accumulation is endogenous and determines the growth of employment. Two regimes are possible, one in which workers' saving dominates the long run and a second in which the long-run equilibrium growth rate is determined completely by the capitalist saving function, sometimes called the Cambridge equation. The second regime exhibits a version of the Pasinetti paradox: changes in workers' saving affect the level, but not the growth rate, of capital in the long run. Applied to social security, this result implies that an unfunded system relying on payroll taxes reduces workers' lifetime wealth and saving, creating level effects on the capital stock without affecting its long-run growth rate. These effects are mitigated by the presence of a reserve fund, various levels of which are examined. Calibrating the model to realistic parameter values for the US facilitates an interpretation of the controversies over the percentage of the national wealth originating in life-cycle saving and the effects of social security on saving. The model is offered as an analytical framework for the review of current topics in fiscal policy, in particular identifying the social security reserve fund as a potential vehicle for generating capital accumulation and effecting a progressive redistribution of wealth.

Key Words: Overlapping generations growth • Social security • Pasinetti paradox

Manuscript received April 2, 2001; final version received June 6, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
T. R. Michl
Comments on Cesaratto's 'Transition to fully funded pension schemes: a non-orthodox criticism'
Camb. J. Econ., November 1, 2006; 30(6): 981 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
S. Cesaratto
A reply to Michl
Camb. J. Econ., November 1, 2006; 30(6): 985 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
S. Cesaratto
Transition to fully funded pension schemes: a non-orthodox criticism
Camb. J. Econ., January 1, 2006; 30(1): 33 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.