Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amariglio, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ruccio, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B10 - General
Right arrow B12 - Classical
Right arrow B13 - Neoclassical through 1925
Right arrow B20 - General
Right arrow B40 - General
Right arrow B41 - Economic Methodology
Right arrow B50 - General
Right arrow D50 - General
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics 26:81-103 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 Cambridge Political Economy Society

Article

Modern economics: the case of the disappearing body?

Jack Amariglio and David F. Ruccio

Merrimack College and University of Notre Dame

Abstract

The human body is said, by critics of mainstream, modern economics, to have ‘disappeared’ from economic theory over the past century. Like subjectivity, the body is thought to have been displaced through mathematical formalism. In this paper, we present the story of this purported disappearance, from the emergence of the ‘full’ desiring and labouring body in Classical economics to its supposed elimination in contemporary neoclassical theory. We also present a critique of this narrative, since the story of the body's disappearance presumes a universal ‘real’ body as a norm. In criticising this story for its humanism and universalism, we provide an alternative reading of contemporary neoclassical economics in which a decentred, fragmented, ‘postmodern’ body (rather than no body at all) can be seen to emerge.

Key Words: Body • Classical political economy • Methodology • Postmodernism • Heterodox economics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crit SociolHome page
A. C. Finlayson, T. A. Lyson, A. Pleasant, K. A. Schafft, and R. J. Torres
The "Invisible Hand": Neoclassical Economics and the Ordering of Society1
Crit Sociol, July 1, 2005; 31(4): 515 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.