Cambridge Journal of Economics 25:149-163 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 Cambridge Political Economy Society
Article |
The role of the state and the hierarchy of money
University of Missouri-Kansas City, Department of Economics, 211 Haag Hall, 5100 Rockhill Road, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
E-mail: BellSA@umkc.edu
Abstract
This paper uses Minsky's definition of money as a two-sided balance sheet phenomenon to challenge many common positions on the nature, evolution and role of money. His definition is applied to two opposing theories in the history of monetary debates, and it is shown that the Chartalists (as opposed to the Metallists) developed a general theory of money that can be applied equally convincingly to the entire era of state money. This theory is then used to show that the state's power to make and enforce tax laws renders its money the most acceptable form of debt within what can be considered a 'hierarchy' of monies. This leads to some important policy implications as well as a strengthening of the endogenous money position.
Key Words: money taxes chartalist metallist monetary