Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boylan, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by O'Gorman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B31 - Individuals
Right arrow B41 - Economic Methodology
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © Cambridge Political Economy Society

research-article

Kaldor on method: a challenge to contemporary methodology

Thomas A. Boylan and Paschal O'Gorman*

*University College Galway Ireland

Abstract

This paper examines Kaldor's methodological critique of orthodox economic theory in the light of recent developments in the philosophy of science. Lawson has provided the most philosophically sophisticated interpretation of Kaldor's methodological work available to date from a critical realist perspective. We argue in this paper that critical realism, while clearly superior to existing orthodox approaches, is philosophically too restrictive and an alternative framework, causal holism, is developed. Causal holism, based on a synthesis of Quine's holism and van Fraassen's constructive empiricism, provides a methodological reconstruction of Kaldor that is ultimately more compatible with his ‘non-monist’ critique of orthodox equilibrium economics.

Manuscript received October 7, 1994; final version received November 23, 1995.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
S. McGovern
Dealing with the Duhem-Quine thesis in financial economics: can causal holism help?
Camb. J. Econ., January 1, 2006; 30(1): 105 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.