Copyright © Cambridge Political Economy Society
research-article |
On Kaldor and pensions
*University of Cambridge
Abstract
In this paper the Kaldorian Saving Function on differential propensities between household and corporate income is restated and extended to account for saving through occupational pension funds. The extended hypothesis is then tested and compared to Kaldor's own, using recent UK data. Solid support is found for the Kaldorian hypothesis and the extended Corporate Capitalism Saving Function. Our findings cast doubt on the Life Cycle and related hypotheses on savings. They also raise interesting questions about neoclassical and post-Keynesian theories of growth and distribution.
Manuscript received March 6, 1995; final version received October 30, 1995.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Hein and L. Vogel Distribution and growth reconsidered: empirical results for six OECD countries Camb. J. Econ., May 1, 2008; 32(3): 479 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
