Copyright © Cambridge Political Economy Society
research-article |
The Kaleckian model of growth and distribution and its neo-Ricardian and neo-Marxian critiques
*University of Ottawa Canada
Abstract
This paper analyses the newer Kaleckian models of growth and distribution and the criticisms that have been addressed to them by neo-Marxian and neo-Ricardian authors. The models discussed assume overhead labour costs and target return pricing. The main issues are the form of the investment function and the notions of normal rates of profit and of normal rates of capacity utilisation. Despite the relevance of (and often the similarity between) the neo-Marxian and neo-Ricardian critiques, it is shown that the main features of the Kaleckian growth model may still be preserved.
Manuscript received September 18, 1992; final version received September 20, 1993.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Skott and S. Ryoo Macroeconomic implications of financialisation Camb. J. Econ., November 1, 2008; 32(6): 827 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lavoie Traverse, Hysteresis, and Normal Rates of Capacity Utilization in Kaleckian Models of Growth and Distribution Review of Radical Political Economics, December 1, 1996; 28(4): 113 - 147. [Abstract] |
||||

