| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appears in the following Cambridge Journal of Economics issue: Special Issue: The Global Financial Crisis [View the issue table of contents]
The costs of coupling: the global crisis and the Indian economy
* Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
Address for correspondence: Jayati Ghosh; email: jayatig{at}bol.net.in
The view that the Indian economy would be less adversely affected by the global economic crisis because of limited integration and other inherent strengths has proved to be wrong. The economic boom in India that preceded the current downturn was dependent upon greater global integration in three ways: greater reliance on exports particularly of services; increased dependence on capital inflows, especially of the short-term variety; and the role these played in underpinning a domestic credit-fuelled consumption and investment boom. These in turn made the growth process more vulnerable to internally and externally generated crises, as is now becoming clear.
Key Words: Financial crisis India Growth Exports Foreign investment Exchange rate Consumption Savings Investment Employment Unemployment Credit-financed growth Stock market Risk Financial vulnerability
JEL classifications: E200, E240, G100, G180
Manuscript received March 25, 2009; final version received May 8, 2009.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Blankenburg and J. G. Palma Introduction: the global financial crisis Camb. J. Econ., July 1, 2009; 33(4): 531 - 538. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
