Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on November 18, 2008
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2009 33(2):193-209; doi:10.1093/cje/ben049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/2/193    most recent
ben049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerstenetzky, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B41 - Economic Methodology
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Plural situational logic: the rationa(lisabi)lity principle

Celia Lessa Kerstenetzky*

* Economics Department, Federal Fluminense University, Rio de Janeiro

Address for correspondence: Economics Department, Federal Fluminense University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; email: celiakersten{at}gmail.com

In the context of a critique of the exclusive use of the rational choice approach in economics, the article presents a pluralistic interpretation of the Popperian notion of situational logic as an alternative approach. This is proposed in connection with a reading of the rationality principle as a rationalisability principle. I argue that this principle can accommodate an ample array of rational responses to different situations and even rationalise the multiple responses that are given to the same situation. I present some examples to illustrate the relevance of the proposed interpretation.

Key Words: Rationality principle • Rationalisability principle • Popper • Rational choice • Situational logic

JEL classification: B41

Manuscript received April 16, 2007; final version received April 24, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.