Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on June 17, 2008
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2009 33(1):1-24; doi:10.1093/cje/ben023
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On technological objects and the adoption of technological product innovations: rules, routines and the transition from analogue photography to digital imaging
* Judge Business School, University of Cambridge and Kings College, London, University of London
Address for correspondence: Jochen Runde, Judge Business School, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK; email: j.runde{at}jbs.cam.ac.uk
We extend the transformational model of social activity proposed in recent realist social theory by importing into it a theory of technological objects and technological change. The paper begins with an account of the transformational model, focusing particularly on the relationship between routines and social rules. We then outline a theory of what we call the technical identity of technological objects, drawing on the notion of collective assignments of agentive functions proposed by the philosopher John Searle. Finally, we link this theory to the transformational model and derive three broad categories of technological change. The framework as a whole is illustrated with empirical material drawn from a recent study of the shift from analogue photography to digital imaging in consumer photography.
Key Words: Social rules Routines Technological objects Technological change Analogue photography Digital imaging
JEL classifications: L1, L2, 03K
Manuscript received April 23, 2007; final version received November 16, 2007.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Faulkner, C. Lawson, and J. Runde Theorising technology Camb. J. Econ., January 1, 2010; 34(1): 1 - 16. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
