Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on October 27, 2007
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2008 32(2):295-324; doi:10.1093/cje/bem031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/2/295    most recent
bem031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Budzinski, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow K21 - Antitrust Law
Right arrow L40 - General
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Monoculture versus diversity in competition economics

Oliver Budzinski*

* Philipps-University of Marburg, Germany

Address for correspondence: Philipps-University of Marburg, Department of Economics, Chair of Economic Policy, Am Plan 2, D-35032 Marburg, Germany; email: budzinski{at}staff.uni-marburg.de

Economics rightfully represents the major basis for competition policy. Next to generating knowledge about competition and its welfare effects, the currently popular ‘more-economic approach’ is charged with a number of additional hopes and expectations. While this article highlights the benefits of economics-based competition policy, it takes a cautious stance towards excessive expectations, in particular regarding the idea that a monocultural, ‘unified’ competition theory as an exact, objective and unerring scientific approach to antitrust could make normative assessment and generalisations superfluous. Diversity in competition economics is advocated in two ways. First, competition economics is empirically characterised by a considerable pluralism of theories and policy paradigms. Second, it is demonstrated that this diversity of theories is theoretically beneficial for future scientific progress. As no ultimate competition theory can ever be expected., the ‘more-economic approach’ must be extended in order to embrace diversity.

Key Words: Antitrust • More-economic approach • Competition policy paradigms • Industrial economics • Methodology of science

JEL classifications: L40, B50, L10, K21

Manuscript received January 9, 2006; final version received February 7, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Competition Law and EconomicsHome page
O. Budzinski and I. Ruhmer
MERGER SIMULATION IN COMPETITION POLICY: A SURVEY
Journal of Competition Law and Economics, September 11, 2009; (2009) nhp014v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.