Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on May 15, 2007
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2007 31(5):789-804; doi:10.1093/cje/bem003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/5/789    most recent
bem003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foss, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Garzarelli, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B31 - Individuals
Right arrow B52 - Institutional; Evolutionary
Right arrow B53 - Austrian
Right arrow D80 - General
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Institutions as knowledge capital: Ludwig M. Lachmann's interpretative institutionalism

Nicolai J. Foss and Giampaolo Garzarelli*

* Copenhagen Business School and Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen; and School of Economics and Business Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg and University of Catanzaro, Italy, respectively

Address for correspondence: Giampaolo Garzarelli, School of Economic and Business Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa; email: giampaolo.garzarelli{at}wits.ac.za

This article revisits the socioeconomic theory of the Austrian School economist Ludwig M. Lachmann. By showing that the common claim that Lachmann's idiosyncratic (i.e., eclectic and multidisciplinary) approach to economics entails nihilism is unfounded, it reaches the following conclusions. (1) Lachmann held a sophisticated institutional position vis-à-vis economics that anticipated developments in contemporary new institutional economics. (2) Lachmann's sociological and economic reading of institutions offers insights for the problem of coordination.

Key Words: Comparative institutional analysis • Coordination • Expectations • Institutional evolution • Interpretative institutionalism

JEL classifications: B31, B52, B53, D80

Manuscript received June 9, 2006; final version received October 2, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.