Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on November 30, 2005
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2006 30(4):521-539; doi:10.1093/cje/bei094
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/4/521    most recent
bei094v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLure, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
Right arrow B41 - Economic Methodology
Right arrow H30 - General
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Article

The fiscal sociology of Gino Borgatta: Pareto, extra-economic redistribution and economic growth

Michael McLure*

* University of Western Australia

Address for correspondence: Economics Program (M251), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; email: Michael.McLure{at}uwa.edu.au

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish the extent to which Borgatta's early fiscal sociology is consistent with, and different from, Vilfredo Pareto's critical views on fiscal theory. Particular emphasis is given to the treatment of the relationship between ‘extra-economic’ redistribution, achieved through fiscal measures, and economic growth. Since evidence of Pareto's influence is much weaker in Borgatta's more mature studies, the ‘definitive’ Paretian fiscal sociology that emerged in his early ‘Lo Studio Scientifico dei Fenomeni Finanziari’ is investigated for possible indications of why Borgatta did not subsequently develop fiscal studies further along Paretian lines.

Key Words: Borgatta • Fiscal • Growth • Pareto • Redistribution • Sociology

JEL classifications: A12, B31, B41, H30

Manuscript received July 26, 2004; final version received July 26, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.