Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on March 22, 2006
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2006 30(3):479-482; doi:10.1093/cje/bel008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/3/479    most recent
bel008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Vroey, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B22 - Macroeconomics
Right arrow E12 - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian
Right arrow E13 - Neoclassical
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Notes and Comments

Keynes, Lucas and involuntary unemployment: a reply to Hayes

Michel De Vroey*

* Université Catholique de Louvain

Address for correspondence: Université Catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques, 3 Place Montesquieu, 1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium; email: devroey{at}ires.ucl.ac.be

Abstract

In this response to Mark Hayes's criticism of his article, ‘Lucas on involuntary unemployment’, the author insists on the need to draw a distinction between labour rationing (a market outcome) and unemployment (the activity of job seeking). Economic theory is mainly concerned with the former. Yet the issue of the voluntarity versus the involuntarity of unemployment pertains to unemployment as an activity. Failing to make this distinction cannot but lead to semantic confusion.

Key Words: Keynes • Lucas • Involuntary unemployment

JEL classifications: B22, E12, E13

Manuscript received December 1, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.