Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on March 22, 2006
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2006 30(3):479-482; doi:10.1093/cje/bel008
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes and Comments |
Keynes, Lucas and involuntary unemployment: a reply to Hayes
* Université Catholique de Louvain
Address for correspondence: Université Catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques, 3 Place Montesquieu, 1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium; email: devroey{at}ires.ucl.ac.be
Abstract
In this response to Mark Hayes's criticism of his article, Lucas on involuntary unemployment, the author insists on the need to draw a distinction between labour rationing (a market outcome) and unemployment (the activity of job seeking). Economic theory is mainly concerned with the former. Yet the issue of the voluntarity versus the involuntarity of unemployment pertains to unemployment as an activity. Failing to make this distinction cannot but lead to semantic confusion.
Key Words: Keynes Lucas Involuntary unemployment
JEL classifications: B22, E12, E13
Manuscript received December 1, 2005.