Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Economics Advance Access originally published online on August 8, 2005
Cambridge Journal of Economics 2006 30(3):347-370; doi:10.1093/cje/bei065
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/3/347    most recent
bei065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohun, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow C82 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data
Right arrow E24 - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution
Right arrow E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
Right arrow O51 - U.S.; Canada
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Article

Distributive shares in the US economy, 1964–2001

Simon Mohun*

* Queen Mary, University of London

Address for correspondence: School of Business and Management, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK; email: s.mohun{at}qmul.ac.uk.

Abstract

Specifying the labour theory of value in a way that distinguishes both productive from unproductive labour, and production workers from supervisory workers, this paper considers distributive shares in the US economy between 1964 and 2001. Trends in productive and unproductive labour are explored in full-time equivalents, hours and money. After 1979, there was a large shift of money value (not matched by a shift in either hours or employment) from the wages paid to productive labour to those paid to supervisory labour. Since the wage share in money value added of non-supervisory labour in unproductive sectors was approximately constant, the 1980s and 1990s also saw the profits share squeezed by the rising wage share of supervisory workers. Some implications of this are explored in the construction of a class rather than a factor approach to distributive shares.

Key Words: Productive and unproductive labour • Distributive shares • Wage share • Profit share • US economy

JEL classifications: C82, E24, O51

Manuscript received May 17, 2004; final version received November 16, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
S. Mohun
Aggregate capital productivity in the US economy, 1964-2001
Camb. J. Econ., September 1, 2009; 33(5): 1023 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.