Skip Navigation

Cambridge Journal of Economics 2005 29(3):475-496; doi:10.1093/cje/bei029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B51 - Socialist; Marxian; Sraffian
Right arrow E11 - Marxian; Sraffian; Institutional; Evolutionary
Right arrow E12 - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Review Article

A history of post-Keynesian economics

Prue Kerr*

* Honorary Research Fellow of the Discipline of English, Communication and Cultural Studies, School of Social and Cultural Studies, University of Western Australia

Address for correspondence: Discipline of English, Communication and Cultural Studies, School of Social and Cultural Studies, University of Western Australia; email: pruekerr{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au

John King, in his A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936, raises the question of whether there exists a body of work which can be called, collectively, post Keynesian. This paper presents some criteria for addressing this question, beginning with the vision and the origins of some of the post-Keynesian ideas, leading to an examination of certain features of the various groups, including their methodology and their approaches to uncertainty, their pricing theories and their growth theories. It is concluded that, although there is much diversity in the various groups, they are reconcilable when seen as referring to different aspects of the economic process and at differing levels of abstraction.

Key Words: Kalecki • Keynes • King • Robinson • Sraffa • growth • methodology • pricing

JEL classifications: B51, E11, E12

Manuscript received March 15, 2004; final version received July 14, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.