Skip Navigation

Cambridge Journal of Economics 2005 29(3):325-341; doi:10.1093/cje/bei045
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L65 - Chemicals; Rubber; Drugs; Biotechnology
Right arrow R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth [...]
Right arrow O31 - Innovation and Invention: [...]
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Rational drug design, the knowledge value chain and bioscience megacentres

Philip Cooke*

* Cardiff University

Address for correspondence: Centre for Advanced Studies, Cardiff University, 44–45 Park Place, Cardiff, Wales; email: cookepn{at}cf.ac.uk

This paper seeks to trace important shifts and cluster evolution in the healthcare industry. Its key aim is to examine the implications of the rise of science-based clusters for economic geography and related policies. A special focus is biosciences and the rise of ‘biologics’ more generally at the expense of fine chemistry in drug development. The old agglomerations of pharmacy are no longer leaders in knowledge exploration, as universities, research laboratories and medical schools take over research, they are beginning to lose prominence to dedicated biotechnology firms (DBFs) in knowledge examination, and retain their most important involvement as financiers and marketers of DBF exploitation knowledge. This has profound geographical as well as industry organisation equilibrium effects. Over-concentration of the bioscientific knowledge value chain has given rise to the new spatial policy practice of developing regional science strategies. Aspects of these are commented upon.

Key Words: Bioscience • Knowledge transfer • Clustering • Regional innovation • Science policy

JEL classifications: O31, L65, R11

Manuscript received March 21, 2003; final version received September 29, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cambridge J Regions Econ SocHome page
H. L. Smith, S. Romeo, and S. Bagchi-Sen
Oxfordshire biomedical university spin-offs: an evolving system
Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, July 1, 2008; 1(2): 303 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.