Skip Navigation

Cambridge Journal of Economics 2004 28(5):683-704; doi:10.1093/cje/beh027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jirjahn, U.
Right arrow Articles by Stephan, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow J16 - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
Right arrow J31 - Wage Level and Structure; [...]
Right arrow J33 - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, No. 5, © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2004; all rights reserved

Gender, piece rates and wages: evidence from matched employer–employee data

Uwe Jirjahn and Gesine Stephan*

Address for correspondence: Uwe Jirjahn, Institut für Quantitative Wirtschaftsforschung, Universität Hannover, Königsworther Platz 1, 30167 Hannover, Germany; email jirjahn{at}mbox.iqw.uni-hannover.de

Why are women disproportionately on piece rates? We investigate three possible explanations: (1) Women are more likely to be on piece rates, because they have a shorter expected tenure than men. (2) A greater demand for flexibility between work and home attracts women to work place technologies suitable for variable pay based on individual performance. (3) Women prefer piece rates, because they are subject to less wage discrimination when objective performance measures are available. The weight of our empirical evidence supports the third hypothesis. The unexplained gender wage gap is substantially smaller in the piece-rate regime than in the time-wage regime.

Key Words: Gender • Pay • Tenure • Flexibility • Discrimination

JEL classifications: J33, J31, J16

Manuscript received January 28, 2002; final version received October 21, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.