Skip Navigation

Cambridge Journal of Economics 2004 28(5):653-666; doi:10.1093/cje/beh030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baccini, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B31 - Individuals
Right arrow B41 - Economic Methodology
Right arrow D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk [...]
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, No. 5, © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2004; all rights reserved

High pressure and black clouds: Keynes and the frequentist theory of probability

Alberto Baccini*

Address for correspondence: Professor Alberto Baccini, Dip. di Economia Politica, Università di Siena, via P. A. Mattioli, 10, 53100 Siena, Italy; email baccini{at}unisi.it

The thesis of this paper is that Keynes wrote A Treatise on Probability in opposition to the frequentist theory of probability, systematised by John Venn, which denied any role for probability in decision theory. Keynes was interested in finding an alternative conception of probability that could be utilised as a guide of life. To analyse this point, the paper considers Keynes's criticisms of frequentist tradition in the two versions of his Fellowship dissertation, and in the published edition of his Treatise. Keynes's project is then illustrated with the famous example of whether or not to go out with one's umbrella in the situation in which the pressure is high and the clouds are black.

Key Words: John Maynard Keynes • John Venn • Probability • Decision theory

JEL classifications: B31, B41, D81

Manuscript received September 10, 2001; final version received May 13, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.