Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Robson, P. J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L14 - Transactional Relationships; [...]
Right arrow L80 - [Industry Studies: Services] General
Right arrow M13 - Entrepreneurship
Right arrow D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; [...]
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics 28:471-488 (2004)
Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, No. 4, © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2004; all rights reserved

The role of trust and contract in the supply of business advice

Robert J. Bennett and Paul J. A. Robson*

Address for correspondence: Robert J. Bennett, University of Cambridge, Department of Geography, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK; email rjb{at}cam.ac.uk.

The use of legal contract and personal trust are compared in this paper for the relationships between clients and their different advisers who supply business advice. Personal trust between client and adviser is found to operate as an exclusive means to manage relational exchange only for social and family relationships. Using a sample survey of small and medium sized enterprises, results demonstrate that trust and legal contract are most commonly overlapping categories. Comparing different types of adviser, the level of trust, extent of legal contract, service intensity, service costs and client impact and satisfaction are each found to interact. There are major differences between suppliers, but except in the case of social and family relationships to advisers, higher reliance on trust alone is generally associated with lower levels of client impact and satisfaction received. The combination of trust with contract tends to be the route which is most associated with higher levels of client impact and satisfaction.

Key Words: Trust • Consultancy • Small firms • Business Link

JEL classifications: D23, L14, L80, M13

Manuscript received May 2, 2000; final version received September 16, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
F. Lyon and G. Porter
Market institutions, trust and norms: exploring moral economies in Nigerian food systems
Camb. J. Econ., June 1, 2007; (2007) bem008v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
R. J. Bennett and M. Ramsden
The Contribution of Business Associations to SMEs: Strategy, Bundling or Reassurance?
International Small Business Journal, February 1, 2007; 25(1): 49 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
S. Beugelsdijk
A note on the theory and measurement of trust in explaining differences in economic growth
Camb. J. Econ., May 1, 2006; 30(3): 371 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
G. Mollering
The Trust/Control Duality: An Integrative Perspective on Positive Expectations of Others
International Sociology, September 1, 2005; 20(3): 283 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
R. J. Bennett and C. Smith
The Selection and Control of Management Consultants by Small Business Clients
International Small Business Journal, October 1, 2004; 22(5): 435 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.