| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cambridge Journal of Economics 28:347-363 (2004)
Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, No. 3, © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2004; all rights reserved
Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine
Address for correspondence: Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies (ECIS), Faculty of Technology Management, TEMA 1.14, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands email: a.nuvolari{at}tm.tue.nl
This paper argues that what Robert Allen has termed collective invention settings (that is, settings in which competing firms share technological knowledge) were a crucial source of innovation during the early phases of industrialisation. Until now this has been very little considered in the literature, which has focused on the patent system as the main institutional arrangement driving the rate of innovation. The paper presents one of these collective invention settings, the Cornish mining district, in detail. It studies the specific economic and technical circumstances that led to the emergence of this collective invention setting and analyses its consequences on the rate of technological innovation.
Key Words: Incremental innovation Patents Collective invention Steam engines
JEL classifications: O31, O34, N53
Manuscript received June 29, 2001; final version received July 16, 2002.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Giuliani Cluster Absorptive Capacity: Why do Some Clusters Forge Ahead and Others Lag Behind? European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2005; 12(3): 269 - 288. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
