Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chortareas, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pelagidis, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow F15 - Economic Integration
Right arrow F19 - Other
Right arrow F20 - General
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics 28:253-271 (2004)
Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2, © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2004; all rights reserved

Trade flows: a facet of regionalism or globalisation?

Georgios E. Chortareas and Theodore Pelagidis*

Address for correspondence: Theodore Pelagidis, Department of European Studies, Panteion University of Athens, 136 Syngrou Av., 17671 Athens, Greece; email: pelagidi{at}panteion.gr

This paper examines the evidence about the extent of globalisation by focusing on some aspects of international trade flows. A reinterpretation of the existing evidence based on the analysis of tables and a range of indicators is provided in the first part of the paper. The focus is on whether the increase in trade flows has been predominantly a global or regional phenomenon. The analysis points to the tentative conclusion that the dominant tendency is the increase in trade within regional blocs (North America, the EU and the Asia–Japan blocs) rather than across them. To address the same question, a more formal analysis is undertaken in the second part of the paper, by focusing on the relative speed of the convergence in openness within and across regions of the world. Our results indicate that the degree of openness converges faster across the countries of a given region rather than at the global level, reinforcing the conclusions from the first part of the paper. The results are consistent with the view that trade integration is more of a ‘regional’ phenomenon than a ‘global’ one.

Key Words: Globalisation • Regionalism • Convergence

JEL classifications: F20, F150, F190

Manuscript received April 9, 2001; final version received August 28, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.