Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Heintz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow F00 - General
Right arrow J30 - General
Right arrow O19 - International Linkages to Development; [...]
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics 28:153-171 (2004)
Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2, © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2004; all rights reserved

Global apparel production and sweatshop labour: can raising retail prices finance living wages?

Robert Pollin, Justine Burns and James Heintz*

Address for correspondence: Robert Pollin, Department of Economics and Political Economy Research Institute (PERI), University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA 01002, USA; email: pollin{at}econs.umass.edu

This paper provides some empirical evidence on issues raised by the global anti-sweatshop movement. We first consider the relationship between wage and employment growth, finding no consistent trade-off between them. We then measure the share of labour costs in the production of garments in the US and Mexico. We find that the retail price increases necessary to absorb the costs of raising wages substantially are small, well within the range of price increases that polls suggest US consumers are willing to pay. We close by considering some implications of these results.

Key Words: Global sweatshop labour • Empirical analysis

JEL classifications: F0, J3, O19

Manuscript received April 26, 2002;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
J. Heintz
Low-wage manufacturing and global commodity chains: a model in the unequal exchange tradition
Camb. J. Econ., July 1, 2006; 30(4): 507 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.