Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felipe, J.
Right arrow Articles by McCombie, J. S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B41 - Economic Methodology
Right arrow O40 - General
Right arrow O50 - General
Right arrow E23 - Production
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics 27:695-721 (2003)
Copyright © 2003 Cambridge Political Economy Society

Article

Some methodological problems with the neoclassical analysis of the East Asian miracle

Jesus Felipe and J. S. L. McCombie*

*Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines, and Downing College, Cambridge, respectively.

Abstract

This paper discusses the recent controversy over the sources of economic growth in East Asia. This empirical work has either used growth accounting or estimated econometrically aggregate production functions. It is shown that it is possible to approximate the value-added accounting identity (i.e., value added equals labour's compensation plus total profits) by a mathematical expression that has all the properties of a well-behaved neoclassical aggregate production function. This implies that statistical estimations of putative aggregate production functions can provide no independent evidence as to whether they accurately describe the production technology of the economy or, indeed, whether the aggregate production function actually exists. A corollary is that the conventional measures of the growth of total factor productivity cannot be unambiguously interpreted as an estimate of the rate of technical progress. The paper reviews the works of Kim and Lau and Young and, in the light of this, explains why both analyses and interpretations of the notion of total factor productivity growth as the rate of technical progress are problematical.

Key Words: Aggregate production function • East Asian miracle • Equifinality Theorem • Income accounting identity • Total factor productivity growth


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Organization EnvironmentHome page
P. Burkett
Total Factor Productivity: An Ecological-Economic Critique
Organization Environment, June 1, 2006; 19(2): 171 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.