| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cambridge Journal of Economics 26:299-311 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 Cambridge Political Economy Society
Article |
The law of value and laws of statistics: sectoral values and prices in the US economy, 197797
Pace University.
Address for correspondence: Andrew J. Kliman, Department of Economics, Pace University, Pleasantville, NY 10570, USA; email: Andrew_Kliman{at}msn.com or akliman{at}pace.edu
Abstract
This study replicates findings that sectoral prices and values are highly correlated cross-sectionally, and that deviations between them are small. Yet after controlling for variations in industry size that produce spurious correlation, I find no reliable evidence that relative values have any influence upon relative prices. The smallness of pricevalue deviations thus does not result from such an influence; it is shown instead to result from a lack of dispersion in the data. Values turn out to be no better predictors of prices than any other random variable with the same probability distribution.
Key Words: Value Price Marx Correlation
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. P. Cockshott and A. Cottrell Robust correlations between prices and labour values: a comment Camb. J. Econ., March 1, 2005; 29(2): 309 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Kliman Reply to Cockshott and Cottrell Camb. J. Econ., March 1, 2005; 29(2): 317 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
