Cambridge Journal of Economics 26:179-200 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 Cambridge Political Economy Society
Article |
Reconsidering the conventional wisdom on wage increases, the choice of technique and employment
Commission Européenne, Beaulieu 1, B-1049 Bruxelles, Belgium; angelo.reati{at}cec.eu.int
Abstract
This paper provides a critical assessment of the neoclassical hypothesis that an increase in the relative price of labour with respect to the price of capital produces a substitution for labour by machinery, thus reducing employment. Several cases of non-uniform wagesin terms of structure as well as in terms of changesare examined, for both a closed and an open economy. The general conclusion is that, although we cannot rule out instances in which the neoclassical mechanism operates, a priori it is not possible to consider that this represents the general case.
Key Words: Choice of technique Capital/labour substitution Relative price of factors Wages and employment
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Reati Book Review Essay: The Battle on Foundations and Its Neglected Issues Review of Radical Political Economics, September 1, 2008; 40(3): 363 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Reati Marrying Economics with History Review of Radical Political Economics, March 1, 2004; 36(1): 111 - 123. [PDF] |
||||
