Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Möllering, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L14 - Transactional Relationships; [...]
Right arrow L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure: [...]
Right arrow Z13 - Social Norms and Social Capital; Social Networks
Right arrow D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; [...]
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics 26:139-160 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 Cambridge Political Economy Society


Article

Perceived trustworthiness and inter-firm governance: empirical evidence from the UK printing industry

Guido Möllering

Institut für Allgemeine Betriebswirtschafteslehre, Boltzmannstr. 20, 14195 Berlin, Germany; moelleri{at}wiwiss.fu-berlin.de

Abstract

The paper describes six representative theoretical positions regarding the impact of trustworthiness on the organisation of inter-firm relations. The positions are then assessed on the basis of a survey of 184 buyer–supplier relationships in the UK printing industry. The widely accepted transaction cost argument for trust as a parameter reducing hierarchy is dismissed. Instead, the so-called triadic forces argument based on Bradach, J. L. and Eccles, R. G. (1989. Price, authority and trust: from ideal types to plural forms, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 15, 96–118) receives the strongest support. Market, hierarchy and trust represent alternative mechanisms that can be combined in a variety of ways. This pluralistic model is enriched further by the acknowledgement of variable roles for contracts and a sceptic stance regarding rationality in practice.

Key Words: Trust • Organisation • Inter-firm relations • Managerial perception • Printing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
F. Lyon and G. Porter
Market institutions, trust and norms: exploring moral economies in Nigerian food systems
Camb. J. Econ., June 1, 2007; (2007) bem008v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
R. J. Bennett and M. Ramsden
The Contribution of Business Associations to SMEs: Strategy, Bundling or Reassurance?
International Small Business Journal, February 1, 2007; 25(1): 49 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
J. T. Murphy
Building Trust in Economic Space
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2006; 30(4): 427 - 450.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
G. Mollering
The Trust/Control Duality: An Integrative Perspective on Positive Expectations of Others
International Sociology, September 1, 2005; 20(3): 283 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
R. J. Bennett and C. Smith
The Selection and Control of Management Consultants by Small Business Clients
International Small Business Journal, October 1, 2004; 22(5): 435 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
R. J. Bennett and P. J. A. Robson
The role of trust and contract in the supply of business advice
Camb. J. Econ., July 1, 2004; 28(4): 471 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.