| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cambridge Journal of Economics 25:785-807 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 Cambridge Political Economy Society
Article |
Where Marx was right: towards a more secure foundation for heterodox economics
University of Waterloo, Canada
La Trobe University, Australia
Abstract
Marx has never been very influential among Western economists, but the collapse of all types of socialist movements has reinforced the belief that Marx is irrelevant for economic analysis. At the same time, some heterodox economists have claimed that neoclassical theory is sufficiently flexible to provide a foundation for post-Keynesians, institutionalists, evolutionary and feminist economists. We argue that both conclusions are incorrect and that Marx's treatment of agents' choices and constraints, and of systemic cooperation and conflict, is far superior to that of orthodoxy in several crucial respects and can provide a better grounding for non-neoclassical analyses.
Key Words: Capitalism Coordination Heterodox economics Marx Violence
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Jossa Marx, Marxism and the cooperative movement Camb. J. Econ., January 1, 2005; 29(1): 3 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
