| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cambridge Journal of Economics 25:669-684 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 Cambridge Political Economy Society
Review Article |
The global economymyths and realities
Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, 9 Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 4DT, UK; j.perraton{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
Hirst and Thompson's Globalization in Question is the key text questioning claims of economic globalisation. This review of its revised second edition examines its main claims: that contemporary levels of international integration fall short of the Gold Standard period; genuinely global companies remain exceptional; capital mobility is not shifting economic activity to developing countries wholesale; international economic activity is primarily regional rather than global; and that international economic activity is sanctioned by nation states and remains subject to their political power. This review argues that, while their evidence provides a useful corrective to extreme globalisation views, focusing on this view understates changes in the international economy.
Key Words: Globalisation International economic integration
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Rutherford and J. Holmes 'The flea on the tail of the dog': power in global production networks and the restructuring of Canadian automotive clusters J. Econ. Geogr., July 1, 2008; 8(4): 519 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Liagouras The Political Economy of Post-Industrial Capitalism Thesis Eleven, May 1, 2005; 81(1): 20 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Rutherford Convergence, the institutional turn and workplace regimes: the case of lean production Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2004; 28(4): 425 - 446. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


