Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow P16 - Political Economy
Right arrow B14 - Socialist; Marxist
Right arrow B24 - Socialist; Marxist
Right arrow B40 - General
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cambridge Journal of Economics 25:555-568 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 Cambridge Political Economy Society

Review Article

Mysticism, method and money in the Marx–Hegel dialectic

Michael Williams

De Montfort University, UK

Abstract

Economic orthodoxy has but a minimal interest in methodology. Heterodoxy is suspicious of dialectics. As exemplified recently in a book by John Rosenthal, even Marxism likes to eschew the notion of any more than a residual Hegelian influence in Marx and Marxist discourse. Bouncing off Rosenthal's argument, this paper argues for the legitimacy of a pragmatic post-Hegelian method for critical political economy.

Key Words: Marx • Hegel • Methodology • Dialectics • Idealism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.