| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cambridge Journal of Economics 23:385-399 (1999)
Copyright © 1999 Cambridge Political Economy Society
Article |
Note and comment. Keynes-plus? Effective demand and changes in firm-level R&D: an empirical note
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
z Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Abstract
Analysing changes over time in firm-level R&D efforts, we find that demand growth in a firm's sector of principal activity has a positive influence on changes in a firm's R&D effort, confirming Schmookler's (1969) 'demand-pull' hypothesis. This finding points to an aspect of effective demand which has never been directly noticed by Keynes or the Keynesians. Such findings are important because of evidence in the literature that a firm's innovation activities are positively related to employment growth, export intensity and profits.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Piva and M. Vivarelli Is demand-pulled innovation equally important in different groups of firms? Camb. J. Econ., September 1, 2007; 31(5): 691 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cainelli, R. Evangelista, and M. Savona Innovation and economic performance in services: a firm-level analysis Camb. J. Econ., May 1, 2006; 30(3): 435 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Palacio-Vera The 'modern' view of macroeconomics: some critical reflections Camb. J. Econ., September 1, 2005; 29(5): 747 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Reati Marrying Economics with History Review of Radical Political Economics, March 1, 2004; 36(1): 111 - 123. [PDF] |
||||

