| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © Cambridge Political Economy Society
article-commentary |
The institutional hiatus in economies in transition and its policy consequences
Economic Affairs officer, UNCTAD Geneva
Senior Economic Affairs officer, ECE Geneva
Abstract
The collapse of Communism created an institutional hiatus in the economies of eastern Europe and the Soviet Union because the old political and economic institutions were destroyed more rapidly than they could be replaced by those of a market economy. The importance and complexity of institution-building has been played down in the mainstream economists consensus' which has presented a highly restricted set of policy options as the only route to a vibrant market economy. This paper argues that entrepreneurship provides a missing conceptual link between enterprise reform and the creation of market institutions. A number of measures for closing the institutional hiatus in transition economies are considered.
Manuscript received August 10, 1995; final version received October 2, 1996.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. S. Manolova and A. Yan Institutional Constraints and Entrepreneurial Responses in a Transforming Economy: The Case of Bulgaria International Small Business Journal, May 1, 2002; 20(2): 163 - 184. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
