Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khalil, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D21 - Firm Behavior
Right arrow D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © Cambridge Political Economy Society

research-article

Is the firm an individual?

Elias L. Khalil*

*Ohio State University, Mansfield Campus

Abstract

This paper shows how three new institutionalist theories try, but ultimately fail to support the firm-as-individual thesis. First, Marx/Hart's idea of property rights and Coase/Williamson's notion of transaction costs are insufficient to substantiate the market/firm dichotomy. Second, Hayek's constructionist view presents the firm, as opposed to the market, as a designed order—no different from artifacts such as tables and cars. Third, Vanberg's constitutionalist theory also fails to support the firm-as-individual thesis. The paper suggests that the ‘consented goal’ notion is a fruitful ground upon which to build the firm-as-individual thesis.

Manuscript received August 18, 1995; final version received July 11, 1996.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
W. A. Jackson
On the social structure of markets
Camb. J. Econ., March 1, 2007; 31(2): 235 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
E. L. Khalil
An anatomy of authority: Adam Smith as political theorist
Camb. J. Econ., January 1, 2005; 29(1): 57 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.